• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

A look at a typical Atheist / evolutionist debating skills or, lack there of.  Click here.


 

Richard Dawkins again reiterates that unless you’re a trained physicist, your opinion doesn’t mean anything. Odd how much Dawkins loves Darwin, yet Darwin had no degree in biology, or any field related to evolution. “Darwin went to Cambridge University to study for priesthood, earning a bachelor of arts degree.” Nor does Dawkins have a degree in theology yet, he has no problem making a living bashing something he has no degree in.  

This is the same tactic he used defending Lawrence Krauss and his book “A Universe from Nothing.” This poster tells it best.


Dawkins nothing2 tn


Remember the age-old question, what came first the chicken or the egg? How about this question, what came first the bee or the human? No bees, no humans. If you take a deep thought into how important bees are to the world, how did 'natural selection' know to use them to pollinate plants to grow food to feed humans? This all happened by chance or was it all part of His master plan. Common sense says every painting has a painter, and every plan has a planner.

Lift up your eyes on high, and behold who hath created these things, that bringeth out their host by number: he calleth them all by names by the greatness of his might, for that he is strong in power; not one faileth. Isaiah 40:26

 

bee

Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
Debunking the myth of evolution right before your...
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools... Romans 1:22

Let us face it, there is a war, there is a war for your soul. To be honest; Christianity has done little to stem the growth tied of this new and hip cult called Atheism. Yes there have always been atheists but thanks to a few factors Atheism is a very fast growing religion.

Atheists will often ask Christians questions they know cannot be answered. My favorite ones are Who created God? or Where is God? I would like to respond by asking them questions that not only do I know they cannot answer, but also that I hope it will start them to question their blind adherence to this religion.
Questions
This question may seem odd as we know today why we have eyes. Remember if you go back far enough when the cells in the boiling soup got together there were no eyes. Even ultra atheist Carl Sagan never explained why the eyes evolved. One of his videos on evolution called Cosmos, shows cells with no eyes, then the next second they have eyes with no explanation why.

"Gradually, those tiny fish evolved, eyes and jaws" Click here to see the video

 

With the passing of Carl Sagan the torch of evolution was passed on to Richard Dawkins. Dawkins is best known for his books on evolution including hate literature like The God Delusion Dawkins like Sagan never tries to explain why the eye evolve but how it evolved.


Evolution?
To better understand the argument on evolution, I have researched evolution by reading books watching videos and searching websites.

In many debates, I have been directed to go to Evolution 101 which is hosted on the University of Berkeley’s website as this is the best definition of what evolution is and how it works. Here is their definition:

“Biological evolution, simply put, is descent with modification. This definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations). Evolution helps us to understand the history of life.”

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/IIntro.shtml

This is a lot different from the definition given by many evolutionists in my many debates. I will ask why do we have eyes and they say ...because of atmospheric conditions, prompts in nature and natural selection...

Sound familiar?

What would have been the cause for the effect of the start of eye evolution?

We are told that evolution is change in DNA over time or descent with modification; however, at the very early stage in the primordial soup there would not have been DNA or RNA or anything that nature could select from.

How did this mysterious force of evolution know how to solve a problem by evolving eyes so the early life forms could see?

How did evolution know what seeing was and what mechanism was used to make it happen?

How did evolution select the optimal number of eyes and their optimal location?

Why not 4 or 6 eyes, why not only 1?

Electromagnetic Spectrum
The mechanics of vision are almost as complicated as the mechanism of the eye itself. To avoid complicated science and keep this as simple as possible, vision, like hearing, operates on a frequency.

Your radio, cell phone, remote control and your eyes operate along the electromagnetic spectrum. (EMS)

Your eyes do not see an object directly; rather, they see light reflected off the object. These light vibrations (frequency) enter the eyes and are decoded into electrical signals that the brain changes into what we see.
How Your Eyes See

“...the light from it enters your eye through the pupil. The iris changes the size of the pupil, depending on how bright the light is. The lens focuses the light onto the back of the eye: the retina. The retina is a mass of light-sensitive neurons, called photoreceptors, which change light signals into electrical ones.”

http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk

Evolutionists have a 2 fold problem:

1) They need to explain why the eye evolved and,

2) How did evolution manage to develop the optimal number, location and mechanism of eyes?

One eye would be no good in the middle of your back or at the wrong frequency along the Electromagnetic spectrum would it?


Download this flyer for you to print and hand out.
Questions or comments please email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.